Apr
4

Automatics vs Manual – How CVT Automatic is More Economical Than Manual

People in Mauritius have for long said that automatic gearbox is slower, heavier and drinks a lot of fuel. This is changing now and people need to learn about the new types of automatics. For many girls, the comfort given by the automatic takes over the fact that they use more fuel but that’s changed now with more economical CVT gearbox – all hybrid vehicles have them, and you bet, they’re better than manual!

Let’s start by listing the different types of gearboxes available:

  • 5-speed manual – these are standard on many vehicles now since the 1990′s. In this one the gears are fixed. The gear lever is used to change between the gears 1,2,3,4,5 and R. Of course, you get better economy when you’re in the highest gear and your throttle is lowest. To accelerate, you have to switch gear to prevent the engine from running too loud (too fast en faite). You’ll use more fuel at 60kph under 3rd gear than in 5th gear because you’d be running a petrol engine at 2500 rpm (tours par minutes) rather than 1500 rpm.
    .
  • 4-speed step automatic – this is the awed slow thirsty automatic. It has only 1,2,3,4 and R. If you have to compare these ratios to the 5-MT above, it’ll be like 1.5, 2.5, 4, 6 and R for Toyota. The gear changes can be more abrupt and the last gear, known as an overdrive, is made for economy. The problem with this type of step auto is that there is loss in power due to its design. Some technical reason for that. It is prevalent in vehicles designed before the early/mid-2000 as well as some new cars. Don’t go buy a brand new automatic Corolla in Mauritius cause that’s what you’ll get! It’s also what you get in the Mazda 3 1st gen and most automatic second hand cars from Singapore (Japanese prefer CVT).
    .
  • 6-speed manual – this is becoming the new standard. Germans Luxuries and sports cars (even Japanese) have been having it for years now. You have then in many lower end cars in Europe and USA now e.g. Corolla, Avensis, Civic, Lancer etc. The gear ratios depend on the type of vehicle it’s made for. Sports cars won’t be more economical. Whereas a 6-speed Civic will be more economical than a 5-speed Civic, because you’ll run the engine at a lower rpm for the same road speed.
    .
  • 5-speed automatic – improved over the 4-speed. You used to get this in luxury cars only. Now you have it in the new Honda City sold in our local market. It’s much more economical than the 4-AT.
    .
  • CVT automatic - Continuously Variable Transmission, like the name says, constantly changes the gear ratio such you have a continuous range from Gear 1 to 6. You can compare it to a 20-speed gearbox. So there’s no shock, and changing of gear! E.g. in a Honda Fit (not Jazz), you can accelerate from 0 to 60kph while keeping the engine at a constant 1500 rpm in less time than a 5-speed manual. The gearbox electronics control the engine rpm based on how hard you press the accelerator. So it’s smoooth, more economical than a manual. Video here: CVT Explained from Youtube
    .
    All new Japanese cars made for Japan – meaning second hand! have CVT e.g. Vitz 2nd gen (we call it Yaris here), Mazda Axela (Mazda3 here), Toyota Corolla Axio, Civic, Mitsubishi Cedia (Lancer), Galant Fortis (Lancer EX). Note that only ABC motors is selling CVT in a Japanese brand in Mauritius. You have CVT gearboxes in the Tiida and Murano (yeah it’s sports SUV).
    .
    Second hand vehicles from Singapore usually have 4-AT. E.g. the Honda Jazz will have 4-AT or 5-AT while the Fit has CVT automatic.

    .

  • Double-Clutch 6-speed – this is the standard automatic you get in sports cars including Lancer Evolution, Porsche, Ferrari and most automatic supercars. As the name says, this one has 2 gearboxes close to each other. One has gears 1,3,5 and the other 2,4,6. While you’re driving in 2nd gear, the other gearbox can be in 3rd. Once you press the paddle (gear shifter), you can imagine the speed in switching. It’s more expensive but sporty as well.
    .
  • Double-Clutch 7-speed – newer version of the DC-6, seen it only in super cars. Bugatti claims that it’d be impossible to accelerate 0-100kph in less than 3 seconds with a manual gearbox. So they developed a 7-speed double clutch for the record breaker 1001hp Bugatti Veyron.
    .
  • 6-speed step automatic only for rear wheel drives due to their size. You get is in BMW’s.
  • 8-speed step automatic only on Toyota Crown and Lexus IS-F.

Well lorries have even more gears, but that’s another subject. Gearbox types in bold are the ones you have to know about.

So the point is that before you buy an automatic car, check if it’s CVT. If it’s the old 4-AT, prepare for lower economy. The problem with CVT now is that they cannot handle the load of a big lorry or bus engine. So these vehicles are stuck with step-auto until further development. Like manuals, they use oil. And another precaution is not to drive in neutral gear (you wouldn’t need to) because of reduced oil pressure…

I’ll write more soon.

Useful websites to learn more are:

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuously_variable_transmission

8 Comments to “Automatics vs Manual – How CVT Automatic is More Economical Than Manual”

  • hehe. great, u wrote about it and even added the plugin :)

    Cheers!

  • Check this out guys…
    http://www.manualversusautomatic.com/

  • Just checked the site. It’s very pro-manual gearbox. There’s one fundamental thing missing in the site’s argument. It makes no difference of the efficiencies of types of gearboxes. And no mention of CVT at all. The one that is pictures is a 4-AT, the worst of existing automatics. Double-clutch is like a manual, and CVT is more efficient (it also has belts, no torque converter). All hybrids that I know use it. To understand how, you need to see the videos or diagrams at least.

  • I remembered that I missed one kind of automatic. Automated manual gearbox. It’s a single-clutch manual-like gearbox where the clutch and gear lever are operated electronically. Toyota sells them in Europe (but not Japan). From forums, I read that they have a lag while changing gears.

  • [...] that Toyota quotes better fuel economy for its CVT version over 5-speed manual (like I say in my other post). Nissan March manages 19 km/L officially for the 4-speed (old) automatic and 21 km/L for 5-MT. All [...]

  • Crystal-clear explanations!!
    One of the best posts I’ve seen in years!
    Now I realise why my old 1.3L Automatic Toyota Starlet was more frugal than my present 1.3L manual Yaris Sedan…
    Bon, donc, my best future buy may be any car with a CVT. Or double-clutch 6-speed, hein? :-)
    Merci boukou. Bahoutt dhanyavaad!

  • Hmmm strange, the Starlet has the old 4-speed automatic. It surely was a diesel. I have another post on diesel vs petrol. http://lallmatie.com/blog/2010/04/03/5-reasons-of-choosing-diesel-over-petrol-cars/

  • Nope, my Starlet was a Reflet-X fitted with a 1.3L petrol engine of 1995, a reconditionned car from (from what I heard from its 3rd owner) Malaysia. But I’ve seen the diesel version (and its black fumes, like an old UBS bus), and i’ve even seen a 4WD version of that Starlet in Port Louis once! Apparently it’s one of the easiest cars to “tune”/modify.
    In any case, Toyota does make great cars, but, as you rightly mentionned in another blog post, the local dealer is putting the brand to shame.
    I’m going to read how far the BMW113d Efficient Dynamics does compare with VW’s Jetta (subjectively, I find it with a repulsive design) in terms of fuel economy.
    Maybe you should add that there are many other things people can do to improve fuel economy: like less useless objects on board (adds to weight and thus more energy required to move it), properly inflated tyres, regular maintenance, raised windows, smooth acceleration and braking, etc, etc…

Leave a comment